|
i must be lost
the whole debate seems so vague and subjective to even attempt to argue in a legal arena.
couldn't jessica and ashley equally argue that they were planning on making a documentary about themselves and therefore claim 'dibs'?
could keith claim to be be planning to make a documentary about them as well? how do you argue who takes precedence?
how did not having the dot com effect the outcome of the movie? who the fuck wouldn't just search google for info on the movie anyway? why wouldn't there just be a link off the simpsons or fox sites?
better yet, why not just pay keith the 5 figures and keep it all out of the press?
|