Keith and The Girl Forums - View Single Post

Jenna_f · 07-08-2008, 04:58 PM

If they had killed that frog/toad in that exact situation for food, that would have been no different then keith stepping on it.
They had a tent with food allready, it's not like they would have needed the frog legs to get by, so killing the frog to cook it's legs would have been just killing it for something to do, like for the experience or something.
Killing that frog in that situation would have just been killing it for entertainment anyway, regardless of intent to eat. So I don't see why Spooky say's he'd be okay with that, but not what happened, it seems arbitrary to draw any sort of difference between the two situations.

07-08-2008, 04:58 PM	#46 (permalink)
Jenna_f Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 136	If they had killed that frog/toad in that exact situation for food, that would have been no different then keith stepping on it. They had a tent with food allready, it's not like they would have needed the frog legs to get by, so killing the frog to cook it's legs would have been just killing it for something to do, like for the experience or something. Killing that frog in that situation would have just been killing it for entertainment anyway, regardless of intent to eat. So I don't see why Spooky say's he'd be okay with that, but not what happened, it seems arbitrary to draw any sort of difference between the two situations. Last edited by Jenna_f; 07-08-2008 at 05:02 PM.
(Offline)