View Single Post
Old 06-22-2009, 04:39 PM   #77 (permalink)
Cretaceous Bob
Senior Member
 
Cretaceous Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2x View Post
um, though I hate replying to your pity retorts, I must point out that companies like Google, Microsoft, and Adobe are monetizing freely distributed products and services. There IS a new model for producing a product and giving it away for free while STILL making money, as Keith and Chemda are proving every day.
The thing you fucking thieves don't seem to realize is the following:

It's perfectly fine if you get things for free, provided that people give them to you for free.

If people ask money for their product, YOU CANNOT HAVE THAT PRODUCT.

END. OF. FUCKING. STORY.

YOU CANNOT HAVE IT.

IF YOU GET IT WITHOUT PAYING, YOU ARE A DISGUSTING THIEF.

It's exceedingly clear that all this bullshit you bastards talk is just an excuse to steal in that 1) you do not boycott things that are not free, thus indicating that you do not want the market to change and are acting accordingly; instead, you have decided to steal, and are demanding that the market react accordingly; 2) NONE OF YOU MAKE SHIT.

The only people talking about a "renaissance" are worthless shits who make nothing, and the people who actually make art are bitching about pirates and TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO PAY FOR THEIR STUFF.

The VAST majority of game developers, musicians, authors, filmmakers, and all other artists DO NOT WANT TO GIVE YOU THEIR SHIT FOR FREE. They are not talking about a renaissance of thievery, they're asking for you to pay for their product, same as always.

If any of you worthless turds actually believed half a shit of what you spout, you still wouldn't steal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2x View Post
I was referring to the next generation of Web Apps that Google, Microsoft, and Adobe are pioneering. Software that cost the company big bucks to develop, but which is being made free to the consumer. There are alternatives to the old revenue generating methods. New Media, like KATG, is taking advantage of this, too.
1) Different mediums. Not sustainable through the same means. You cannot put advertising in an LP, or anything else that would yield revenue over repeated use.

2) KATG is the ONLY product ANYONE has mentioned that is both successful and started out free.

3) So what? Those people are giving stuff away for free. That's nice. That doesn't mean shit for the people who do want you to pay, even if they are the minority (which they're FAR, FAR, FAR away from being). They have a right to refuse to give you their product unless you pay for it, and you only have a right to REFUSE TO BUY IT, NOT TO STEAL IT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2x View Post
Bands should make money off of merchandise, concerts, and ad space on their website. Please tell me, what purpose do publishers serve, other than lining their own pockets? It seems like artists can market and distribute themselves, especially if they're really good. They don't need a lot of capital to stamp thousands of CDs any more, so what's the point?
Funny how no musicians are saying this, you fucking idiot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2x View Post
Try not to let Crusty the Troll get to you- he's just pushing your buttons so he can jerk off to your angry responses.
How many times have you been backed into a corner because of how stupid you are? And yet I'm the one doing something wrong here?

Go back to being condescending to somebody for doing something unsafe while riding a fucking motorcycle, you fucking idiot.

I have a problem with people stealing, and I'm a bad guy? Fuck you, you intolerable douche.

This is the bottom line: If this "renaissance" is a reality, it will happen without you fuckers stealing shit. But you guys know that isn't the truth. The market isn't going to change because of the potentials of new media; if it changes, it'll be only because of excessive stealing.

Last edited by Cretaceous Bob; 06-22-2009 at 04:47 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote