09-20-2009, 09:26 PM
|
#316 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 425
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spooky
straws. you are grasping at straws.
The lighter it is, the more of a factor friction becomes. Making the argument that the plane has only just enough power to just barely get off the ground under nominal conditions, and the treadmill being enough to tip the scale because of the fractional amount of resistance the wheels provide, assuming no air movement, etc, you are creating absurd variables and adding them into a simple equation, needlessly.
Go sleep well tonight, yes, it is a fact that a treadmill does impart some tiny amount of friction, in 99.9999999999999999% of all cases, it doesn't matter. Planes have engines powerful enough in real life to overcome infinitesimally minute variables, but in the case of your imaginary argument, it is possible that they may not. You may as well start throwing in gravity variables, as well, the higher the gravity, the more friction you will get in the wheel bearings.
/rolls eyes
|
Agreed. The only part I take exception to is your poking at me because I've personally conceived of an "imaginary argument"......as if my imaginary argument is somehow interfering with your larger, concrete discussion about airplanes on runway-sized treadmills. (That goes for Grundle, as well.)
|
|
(Offline)
|
|