|
I understand i might sound insane and incoherent when i make my points (and maybe i am) but i'll try to explain.
I think the police force should be harsh to the point of martial law concerning CRIMES.
I do not consider doodling a crime, so cuffing the girl was silly, mostly because it was a waste of police time and probably didnt deter anyone from doing it. But if a kid is found dealing that is a crime and i'm in favour of extreme punishment for it. And i think that if a druf dealing minor was shot in a public execution, that would be a strong deterrent.
In the case of the cop a snowball. I think that the NY cop, which was chased, acted like a pussy. Snowballs are annoying but they're not a crime or a threat. He called for backup and wasted other policemen's time. He pulled out a gun and could have got somebody's killed (where a snowball is hardly lethal).
But i understand that a bunch of annoying 20 year olds targeting a policeman with their dumb snowballs deserve a lesson, so a nice old school beating in a room could definitely work (because probably these guys never got a spanking in their life).
So, to recap: different degrees of punishment dor different degrees of wrong doings. Serious Crimes = execution, lack of respect for the authority=jail and a few beatings.
Doodling isnt serious enough to me to involve authority.
Sorry, if i make no sense. I try to plant moral pickets in my head but it aint easy.
If i sounded dumb i'll buy another few books to repent.
|