View Single Post
Old 09-12-2010, 07:49 AM   #4374 (permalink)
standardman
Senior Member
 
standardman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 3,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Space Indaver View Post
I do think a number can be applied to "quality" of a game, eg. I would probably give Resi Evil 5 at least a 7.5 based on its production values, but for personal taste it would get around a 3.0 purely because of the aiming.

Using that Batman as an example, it seems to have got a 7.5 based on the fact that the guy reviewing it doesn't really like 2D fighters or the art style or something. It looks like a very well made, solid game.
My problem with it is that reviewing anything is subjective and numbers suggest it's objective. As if there's some dark science to evalutating a game/movie/album/whatever. Bump mapping on level 3 is worth 0.04 review score points, poor checkpointing is -0.3 and the delivery of this character's final soliloquy has a -1.5 to 3.0 range. Reductive and dishonest nonsense.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote