Quote:
Originally Posted by myq
I mean, part of this question adds the element of "if child porn is illegal but child rape depiction for artistic purposes is not, where do you draw the line" (Keith: 'EVERYWHERE!'), and then we're back to the "I know porn when I see it" ambiguity...
|
I don't want to speak for him, of course, that'd be akin to pedophilia itself, but I think Keith would say why do we need these movies and paintings with child porn in them? Which isn't really a terrible question. What are we (ostensibly non-pedophiles) getting out of that? But alternately, what good is completely ignoring it?