View Single Post
Old 02-14-2014, 02:32 PM   #160 (permalink)
PatDixonNYC
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Queens
Posts: 73
There's a lot of material written on this subject. Read something!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
I know this is a throwback but your conversation with Pat Dickson has been playing on my mind.
Completely removing the subject matter from the equation Pat displayed a talent for manipulative tactics and arguing.
Everything I said was factual, there was no need to manipulate anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
Initially, the back and forth rally between Pat and Chemda was well balanced regardless of who's side you were on, as it went on it was clear Chemda became more passionate and seemed frustrated with Pat's solid defense of a convicted child rapist.
Woody Allen isn't a convicted child rapist, he was never even charged with a crime.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
As soon as shit hit the fan, when Pat finally pushed you two to a point where you would snap under the layers of deliberate poking, he backed off in a condescending and coy bullshit attempt to make you seem further from fact and closer to blind anger.
Keith and Chemda made themselves seem "further from fact and closer to blind anger" by saying inaccurate things and getting angry. You can't blame me for the behavior of the hosts or how you perceive them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
His tactics were manipulative and immature and it seems he needs to take his head out of his ass and take the reactions he probed like the professional he claims to be. I'm 17 and I use the same tactics all the time when i get my parents riled up in an argument and it unsettles me to think a heavily listened to news podcast and someone who acts as if he argues professionally, has the same mental approach to conflict as a 17 year old.
Keep your family issues out of this, junior.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
Chemda, admittdly you got angry and towards the end seemed to attack Pat with evidence and articles but why the fuck not.
Chemda presented no articles, and no credible evidence. What show were you listening to? In fact, when I asked for documentation of their claim that Soon-Yi was 15 when the polaroids were taken, they refused to even look. It's not true, she was in her 20's.

Is it possible you have a learning disability, because there's no shame in that, son.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
You were having a serious conversation with someone who was deliberately a childish headfuck.
No, that's what she does every OTHER day, when I'm not there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHindley View Post
You were passionate and vocal and in no way were you a "bitch" as some people have emailed you, however after a while you became frustratingly infuriated because you were indeed arguing with a sly fuckhead but you did seem to verbally attack him towards the end. Justified.

Superfuck Pat.

Kieth, peace and love peace and love don't hurt me.
Yes I posted this in another thread. but the real question is did he do it
If he's a convicted child rapist, as you claim, then obviously he did it. But he's not, he wasn't even charged. So tell me this: What have you actually read about this case?

But you're right, the fact that I knew more about the subject did annoy them.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote