Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredv1214
the difference between Big Ben and Pat is that Keith actually has several accounts of Pat's actions. Keith said he needed some facts to make a decision. Why wouldn't he? Liza and Megan just twisted everything Keith was saying and getting angry about what they said Keith said which was different than what Keith actually said. Of course alleged victims need to prove their accusations in court because that's the entire point of our court system. Just because Keith is hesitant to say Ben is guilty because he hasn't seen any proof does not mean he is shaming the victims.
|
The problem is that it's not consistent with previous statements. Since when have the public waited until a case makes its way through court before deciding whether or not a person is guilty? Most people jump to conclusions. The thing is though...its been mentioned on the show many times that the men who play professional football have a very specific type of personality. One that is not above attacking people. That's not to say they're all guilty, but Keith has spoken about them in a negative way on the show before.
I do think it's in poor taste to bring up the fact that video evidence or marks all over someone's body (depending on how much the victim claims they were physically abused) is what you need to believe someone's story. It was fine for Megan and Liza to mention it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredv1214
...in the Big Ben case there is only the out-of-court settlement without any of the facts being disclosed. Like I wrote in on the show, innocent people settle out of court all the time and Liza's accusation t
|
There have been at least 3 women who have come forward about it. One took a settlement without recanting her initial accusation.