Mr or Mrs. Bag,
I'm of particular interest how you find justification for the below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nordcharonmir
Roe v Wade at the constitutional level was a 14th amendment ruling based on privacy that ruled in favor of the 14th amendments application thus overruling state/local law because the constitution has legal authority above state and local law. Thus using the same application of the law (which is how the law is designed to work) the second amendment would override local and state laws related to the infringement of the right to bear arms.
|
My position is very clear as is US law that constitution is above and superior in authority to state/local law. How do you square 14th amendment should rule in one area you agree with but 2nd amendment shouldn't rule in another area you disagree with?
I'm actually interested in how you finagle yourself around that inconsistency.