[nordcharonmir]

Originally Posted by vezione

TLR - in situations like this where the person who did it says they have abhorrent views, who are you setting the record for? Cause a lot of this seems MINOR compared to this dude saying he thinks minority are causing the problem.

You sound like an apologist, but I'd like to give you the opportunity to say which side you're actually on.

TLDR yet you've decided I sound like an apologist...how do you know if you didn't read it? Just to make it easy for you, this was my very first written reaction on these boards:

Originally Posted by nordcharonmir

Absolutely disgusting stuff. Terrorist surrendered instead of killing himself like he planned, as a society the right thing to do is get a short rope and tall tree.

Further to the point that you didn't read it...you are responding as if I'm setting the record on his views??? Nope! Just correcting factually inaccurate statements made on the show in this episode, I at no time advocated for the piece of shit shooter's views...maybe read it then respond.

Originally Posted by vezione

And white people - having been born into the system of racism seldom think outside themselves (aka "the norm") to consider how their thoughts, actions could be inspired by racist ideas.

Please elaborate on what you mean by a system of racism. Is in group bias strictly a "white" race phenomenon?

Originally Posted by vezione

And NO. Most domestic violence is committed by RIGHT-WING ideas. The NY Times crunched the numbers.

What? I didn't say left ideology caused domestic violence...again, read the thing you are responding to before responding. What I sad:

Originally Posted by nordcharonmir

11. Far right means murder, far left means marry my couch - Incorrect, most shooting perpetrators who have political leanings are left of center and also more likely to want to fuck their couch. Including this one see above.

I see how maybe you conflated how more than half are domestic abusers but if half (right v left) of half are left leaning....that math doesn't work for your point. I would love to see this NYT number crunch if you have a link since this does not align with any source documentation, super interested how they got there. My guess is they played the game they are playing here and labeling a far left motive as Alt Right. If you label everything right whether it is or not then of course the conclusion will be what you designed it to be from the outset.