Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
03-08-2011, 02:52 PM | #21 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 666
|
Quote:
|
|
(Offline) |
03-08-2011, 03:08 PM | #23 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 666
|
He said ALL OF THAT on the show? I must have missed it...where did he SAY THAT ON THE SHOW? Funny, how I just believe things out of the air with no one actually SAYING it...yes, ON THE SHOW.
|
(Offline) |
Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
03-08-2011, 03:13 PM | #25 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 666
|
|
(Offline) |
03-08-2011, 03:24 PM | #27 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 666
|
oh ok, thanks for clearing that up, for a while there I couldn't figure out why you would infer I was stupid for believing something Keith said because I tend to believe people when they state facts and was basing my thoughts on previous experiences.
|
(Offline) |
03-08-2011, 04:32 PM | #28 (permalink) | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brooklyn, Boston, other.
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Quote:
1) If there are pictures of naked kids in the book, agreed that that is worse and more worthy of being illegal than just words. (But then I would still say, why is it "obscenity laws," and not "child pornography laws," unless that is indeed what it is, in which case I'm on board.) 2) What do you think about the idea of computer-generated pictures of naked kids? Where real children are NOT assaulted. (Sort of the opposite of an organic, free range, locally grown situation--all artificial, no children were harmed in the making of this porn.) I believe that stuff exists and that there have been legal battles over whether it should be allowable. (It would probably be easy for me to google it in the time it takes for me to say how easy it would be, but I didn't. Thoughts or facts, anyone?) |
||
(Offline) |
03-08-2011, 04:43 PM | #29 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 666
|
Quote:
I'm trying to think of a comparable and I can't. Even cruelty to animals isn't a crime if it is only animated. Child porn is just on its own level and even when animated is very wrong. WRONG, Myq Kaplan! |
|
(Offline) |
03-08-2011, 05:08 PM | #30 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brooklyn, Boston, other.
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
Like, you can have a movie where rape is depicted in graphic fashion, yes? Or you could have paintings of horrible violent acts, right? Obviously if you had a movie about a pedophile, I could see not wanting to have a real child even pretend to be molested or what have you (though certainly there are movies where children play abused children, and have to say and do things that, even though pretend, might be arguably traumatic), so in such situations, wouldn't an animated child rapee be the lesser of evils? I mean, part of this question adds the element of "if child porn is illegal but child rape depiction for artistic purposes is not, where do you draw the line" (Keith: 'EVERYWHERE!'), and then we're back to the "I know porn when I see it" ambiguity... Also, what about this: there's obviously not a lot of research done one what makes there be less pedophilic activity. But we know that there certainly are pedophiles who behave themselves, who keep their unfortunate genetic makeup to themselves, and live out their fantasies in fantasy only (Dan Savage calls them "gold star pedophiles"), and it sucks to be them, but it's great that they do what they do, and don't do what they don't. So my question here is, would having access to CGI child porn make there be more satisfiable gold-star pedos? Or would having that exist make them be more likely to go out looking for the real thing, gateway style? Again, I don't know if this is answerable with no real research able to be conducted ethically, but it seems to me that pedophiles are fantasizing anyway, having no porn available might make them go crazier and seek whatever they can, including real children, as opposed to having the potential outlet of animated fake stuff available. Just horrible food for gross thought. PS I am sexually attracted to adults. And arguments. |
|
(Offline) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|