1360: For the Love of God

[punk'n]

I totally thought the Rebecca Black thing sounded like Ke$ha. Sorry, DWarrior. Besides, if you're defending Ke$ha, I don't think you can critique music either. I like to shake my ass to her songs, but she's shit. Come on.


And yay for whores being legal. I'm in.

[Blitzgal]

Agreed, punk'n, to me she has that same nasally autotuned sounding warble that they all have right now. It's annoying as fuck.

Keith is correct that the lawyer might not get disbarred for this. There is a tremendous amount of substance abuse in the legal profession, and usually if they go through some sort of treatment they can keep their license. However, the wrench in this case is that it's very public. If he does get disbarred it will be because it's such a huge story and it's a public embarrassment to his employers.

But I've processed the applications of lawyers with five and six DUIs, breathalyzers on their cars, etc. And they get admitted. Shady dealings with money is treated much more harshly than substance abuse (lawyers who are willing to fuck around with money are extremely dangerous to their clients). In nine years of conducting background investigations on lawyers who are trying to get admitted, I've seen ONE who was disbarred from a previous jurisdiction, and he was a convicted pedophile who was raping 14 year old boys. But after he served his sentence he was admitted to practice law in another state. Lovely, huh?

[Cretaceous Bob]

Keith is completely right about the people who bitch about popular music. The people who complain about Justin Bieber are worse than the people who like it. I never have to think about the abyss of shit that is popular music until some dickhead has to bring him up for no reason to say how much he sucks.

Edit: Also, as talentless and inane as all this autotuned stuff is, I still like it more than the grunge/nu-metal dogshit that was popular late '90s/early '00s. The only way down from there is country.

[Blitzgal]

In the Bible, Lot is the one righteous man in the kingdom of Sodom. He is righteous because instead of allowing the mob of rapists to attack two strangers (who were angels in disguise), he offered his virgin daughter to be raped instead. So, he's allowed to flee the land while God smites everyone else. Then his daughters get him drunk and fuck him to bear his children.

Long story short, if Lot is one of God's chosen, it seems a little ridiculous for Pat Robertson to claim that He is causing earthquakes today because of our immoral behavior. There is all kinds of fucked up sexual shit in the Bible.

I'm totally on board with that mother spending the rest of her life in prison. I'm disgusted that the guy in England only got four years. The article I read made it clear that he had videos of several children on his computer. My guess is that he's the one who brought up the kid fucking to begin with. He should be in prison forever, too.

[Junkenstein]

i discussed this issue a million times, and it gets nowhere since the people who are pro-legalization of prostitution dont seem to see my point which is that no matter how one wants to put prostitution as the ultimate female empowerment, its still sexual abuse made better by money.

a woman can do what she wants with her body, sure, but that doesnt mean that the law has to let that go and say its ok. personally i'm not only against legalization but i'm for a sterner punishment against the client. even if one considers the most rosy situation, its still a repulsive thing. the ladies in amsterdam arent empowered, they're even sadder and more broken than strippers. and the whole place is sitll filled with thugs, and exploiters. only this time the state gets a slice in taxes.

fuck that. argue it as much as you want, its creepy and wrong, like strippers.

Ponr is slightly different, maybe, cause the girls there fuck with other porn guys and not with any fuckin slob that comes up (unless its some of that extreme ponr, which im against too).

its not a religious or sexist thing. it just gives me the creeps and i cant be in favour. and the argument of "whats the difference in paying drinks to a girl is INSULTING".

if any of you girls think that prositution is empowering think that most prostitutes have to fuck guys like doctorsleep, listen to his shit and they cant turn him off cause he pays.

[DWarrior]

We should outlaw shitting on people's faces because that's waaaay more repulsive than prostitution. Also, people with deformities.

[Junkenstein]

its not the same repulsion im talking about, commie

to me its like legalizing abuse, i cant get over it.

[Junkenstein]

liz taylor didnt do "baby jane" (that was bette davis) but she played a drunk, mouthy cunt in "who's afraid of virginia woolf". only movie i saw her in and she's good if you want to pretend that her being a horrible loud fat boozy whore is an act (i dont think it is).

seems like she requested her funeral to be 15 ninutes late, cause she wanted "to be late at her own funeral like a diva". throw her in the trash, i say.

[jorjo]

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

i discussed this issue a million times, and it gets nowhere since the people who are pro-legalization of prostitution dont seem to see my point which is that no matter how one wants to put prostitution as the ultimate female empowerment, its still sexual abuse made better by money.

a woman can do what she wants with her body, sure, but that doesnt mean that the law has to let that go and say its ok. personally i'm not only against legalization but i'm for a sterner punishment against the client. even if one considers the most rosy situation, its still a repulsive thing. the ladies in amsterdam arent empowered, they're even sadder and more broken than strippers. and the whole place is sitll filled with thugs, and exploiters. only this time the state gets a slice in taxes.

fuck that. argue it as much as you want, its creepy and wrong, like strippers.

Ponr is slightly different, maybe, cause the girls there fuck with other porn guys and not with any fuckin slob that comes up (unless its some of that extreme ponr, which im against too).

its not a religious or sexist thing. it just gives me the creeps and i cant be in favour. and the argument of "whats the difference in paying drinks to a girl is INSULTING".

if any of you girls think that prositution is empowering think that most prostitutes have to fuck guys like doctorsleep, listen to his shit and they cant turn him off cause he pays.

I absolutely see your point BUT ...
Does prostitution being illegal mean it ceases to exist? Clearly not.
Does legalising prostitution allow for legal protection, education and support for prostitutes? Yes
Do prostitutes want legalisation? Yes

And, really? Porn is soooo different?? I think you justify that to yourself because you WATCH porn - you may not fuck a hooker and you may not ogle at strippers, but you do watch porn and therefore it's ok. What have you managed to do? Has some little trip occurred in your brain that lets you believe the porn actresses daddy's love them? That they're allowed to select their partners (out of all the amazing looking guys that are in porn)? You're one of those people that thinks what you do is ok, the line you draw in the sand is the right one and people that cross YOUR line have gone too far. Sorry buddy, but porn is sex for money, just like prostitution. As least the prostitutes have some privacy.

And, as far as Dr Sleep goes - would you rather he fuck a sex worker who gets to make a few bucks and leave, or are you happier if he gets to hit it with some sweet, naive little virgin? I know what my preference would be.

[Cretaceous Bob]

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

its still sexual abuse made better by money.

Okay? A lot of jobs are some sort of abuse made better by money.

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

a woman can do what she wants with her body, sure, but that doesnt mean that the law has to let that go and say its ok.

Because the government gets to say what women can do, not women?

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

the ladies in amsterdam arent empowered, they're even sadder and more broken than strippers.

You shoot yourself in the face right there. Strippers aren't broken and sad because they stripped, dude. That's like saying being in poverty causes you to lose your job. No, you mixed something up.

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

personally i'm not only against legalization but i'm for a sterner punishment against the client.

That strikes me as some incredibly patriarchal shit.

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

Ponr is slightly different, maybe, cause the girls there fuck with other porn guys and not with any fuckin slob that comes up (unless its some of that extreme ponr, which im against too).

That doesn't make any sense.

Originally Posted by Junkenstein

if any of you girls think that prositution is empowering think that most prostitutes have to fuck guys like doctorsleep, listen to his shit and they cant turn him off cause he pays.

Prostitution as a job is the same as any other job. They don't have to do anybody, just like I don't have to do jack shit at my job and I don't have to not tell people to blow me.