Latest Episode
Play

Go Back   Keith and The Girl Forums Keith and The Girl Forums Show Talk

Show Talk Talk about the show

View Poll Results: After seeing the pictures, did you find it odd that the girl's mother posted them?
Yes. I agreed with Keith and Lenny. 82 32.67%
No. I agreed with Chemda and Danny. 169 67.33%
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree147Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2015, 04:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
dannyhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,591
2119: Grumpy Old Men

With Lenny Marcus – Keith’s MRI denied; Selma doesn’t include actual MLK speeches; the Golden Raspberry Awards; bad parenting, bad teachers, and inappropriate 18-year-olds; honeymoon plans

Guest:
Lenny Marcus



Share this episode: Twitter, Facebook & email

Get the show: on iTunes, on Stitcher and RSS feed
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 06:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
therewillbesnacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Poland
Posts: 72
I've seen facebook pictures of the girls who I went to high school just a couple years ago, even back in junior high, and they were waaay more blatantly provocative than any of the pictures posted here. It is a little silly to say that she's not trying to be sexy in some of the photos, but honestly what's wrong with trying to look a little sexy in a photo? Is she supposed to wear a turtleneck all summer? It's one thing to be bending over in front of the camera, clear view of your cleavage and all, but none of these photos show anything like that. I guess girls at that age should be cropping out everything below the neck in all their photos.

Also, the fact that you posted the pictures under explicit kinda defeats your argument. Either you did it as a joke to cover up that you're wrong, or you really think they should be marked as explicit, which is silly. I tend to click on the pictures before listening to the full show, and was confused when I saw them marked as explicit, as I'm sure other people were. Paul's beautiful cock on the other hand, well that's a whole different issue. But you see my point.

I think you know you're wrong, Keith.

...
God I feel ridiculous arguing over the facebook pictures of a total stranger's daughter.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 06:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
PARTY! SUPER PARTY!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 13,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by therewillbesnacks View Post
It is a little silly to say that she's not trying to be sexy in some of the photos...
Then you add:

Quote:
Originally Posted by therewillbesnacks View Post
I think you know you're wrong, Keith.
Obviously I'm not wrong, goofball. You agree that she was trying to be sexy.

I found it odd that the mother is bragging about the pictures.

As for why it's marked explicit: I don't want to exploit the family and make them feel weird, so I thought making it a click to view helps that. (When it got pushed that we were so crazy, I thought the pics were necessary to show.)

So now it comes to: why are you disagreeing with Lenny and myself? You agree she's trying to be sexual. Now you need to ask yourself: Is it odd for a mom to be proud of her 18-year-old (at most) posting these pictures?
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 06:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
therewillbesnacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Poland
Posts: 72
My bad. I don't think you're wrong about saying that she's trying to post sexy photos. I think you're wrong about saying that the photos aren't normal. They're absolutely normal for the generation that we live in. But yes, that wasn't the poll. It would be weird if the mom was posting pictures of her daughter with cleavage blatantly in view, or something even more provocative, but these are regular pictures for a mom to post, be them a little braggy.
PastaFace likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 07:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
PARTY! SUPER PARTY!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 13,511
This guy.
Czarveillance and Piscean like this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 07:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Los
Senior Member
 
Los's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Is it odd for a mom to be proud of her 18-year-old (at most) posting these pictures?
If it was just the center photo in the bottom row, I would say yes. The rest of them are normal. A couple of them look like professional shots.
loucah likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 07:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Scumhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Uranus
Posts: 19,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by therewillbesnacks View Post
They're absolutely normal for the generation that we live in.
That is not true, you green cunt.


She's wearing waaay too many clothes to be normal, and there's no pic of her standing in front of the bathroom mirror, staring like a fucktard at her cell phone while striking what she thinks is a provocative pose but what in reality looks like she's suffering from a rare hip disorder or she just shat herself.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 09:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
WittyReference's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 561
The pictures are pretty tame. I wouldn't have been surprised if the mother took out the two with cleavage but it's only minor 'tage (short version of decolletage).

I think the conversation got railroaded away from what's really behind Keith's thoughts. He said the mother at that age was obsessed with her looks and has since had plastic surgery so he's worried she is instilling the same shallow behavior in her child. But still, didn't you say the mum was also boasting about her academic record? Is this more about with how Keith remembers the mother? I'd flick past those pics without even noticing.
__________________
.
We made some music for trippers. On drugs it'll all make sense

https://myspace.com/almostapathy/music/albums
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 09:44 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,396
these pictures are perfectly fine. her make up is well done. it's like those high production porn chicks you like, Keet. you could see that face taking a load. but, she's not. she's just gussied up.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 09:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 447
I voted for Keith/Lenny because I think Chemda confused the issue.

For the record, the question was whether or not it was weird for the mom to be posting those pictures, NOT whether or not the pictures were in good taste/"too provocative."

The pictures are NOT too provocative. They're tasteful and she looks great in them, but it's weird for the mom to be posting the pictures because I think it's weird for any parent to be bragging on Facebook with a photo collage saying "hey guys, look at my hot daughter!"
Keith, crazyrob, Bucho and 7 others like this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Keith and The GirlAd Management plugin by RedTyger