Latest Episode
Play

Go Back   Keith and The Girl Forums Keith and The Girl Forums Show Talk

Show Talk Talk about the show

View Poll Results: Re: Reusing sex toys
I agree with Chemda more 20 57.14%
I agree with Keith more 15 42.86%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree22Likes
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2023, 06:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
PARTY! SUPER PARTY!
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 13,511
If only there was a soap-type substance that cleaned toothbrushes
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2023, 06:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
57-hour Marathon 2015 Kickstarter Backer
 
starscream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
If only there was a soap-type substance that cleaned toothbrushes
Ew.
MongoMike likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2023, 03:10 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 8
On the sex toys...I think those should be "personal". The argument that a penis was in someone before it went in you is not a good argument to me. That is not a positive thing, just like a girl who has a high body count is a negative thing that has to be "gotten over". If we can just replace the toy and not have to "get over" its storied history in others I think that is the way to go.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2023, 03:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecrucial View Post
I think I've said this on the forums before but it keeps coming up.

The part that frustrates me about the dog argument is it never starts from an argument of good faith. I've had people tell me "all dogs are capable of biting". But I can't take the discussion seriously if that's where we're starting.

It's like saying handguns and assault weapons are on equal ground. Sure we know both CAN do damage. And we know gun owners are expected to be responsible for the damage they do (like dog owners).

But if we're being honest, one type is just capable of doing more damage.

I can love a big goofy pitbull. But if you're trying to tell me a corgi is at the same threat level, we aren't have a real conversation.
I don't think the "capability" is exactly the point. I think "likelihood" is the point. In the "likelihood" discussion the analogy w/ gun types is actually inverted; the handgun is far more likely to be used illegally and violently than the rifle. I think this is also apt in this analogy to make the point that just because something may scare you or looks scary isn't the point. It is about which thing is more likely to actually do the harm we are concerned with.

To further elucidate the issue with capability being the metric of measure I would argue there are more capable things to kill your child than a pit bull but it is the likeliness that makes pit bulls/bully breeds the issue. Example - A Kangal, Anatolian Shepard, Great Pyrenees, and arguably to use Keith's example a Rotty, are all more capable to kill a child but a pit bull is FAR more likely to actually do it.
MongoMike likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2023, 12:00 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
2023 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2022 Marathon Kickstarter Backer
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by foboyib946 View Post
I don't think…
What do u think about the whole MongoMike situation though?
MongoMike likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2023, 01:49 PM   #16 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenoTitty View Post
What do u think about the whole MongoMike situation though?
It's very weird.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2023, 07:44 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
2021 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2020 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2019 Marathon Kickstarter Backer24-hour Marathon 2018 Fundraiser Backer38-hour Marathon 2014 Kickstarter Backer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,095
I'm just going to leave this here:

"Dog killed, boy injured in pair of attacks involving dogs from same home"

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...ylaw-1.6814624

"Bylaw said the animals are a mixed breed. Neighbours say the dogs each look like a pit bull breed."
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2023, 04:22 AM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 165
I will never trust a toy that’s sourced from a guy. Worrying about if his dick is clean, in all senses of the word, is enough.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2023, 11:14 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
2023 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2022 Marathon Kickstarter Backer
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rune View Post
I will never trust a toy that’s sourced from a guy. Worrying about if his dick is clean, in all senses of the word, is enough.
Would you trust a toy sourced from a rando chick?
Rune likes this.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2023, 12:09 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenoTitty View Post
Would you trust a toy sourced from a rando chick?
Good point. Honestly, no. But with girls, usually their toys are personal. Whereas, any toy collection a guy accumulates are by definition communal. Think of someone like a Billy Procida. I have other issues that give me pause with that example, but I would definitely need to see that receipt
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Keith and The GirlAd Management plugin by RedTyger