|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Near D.C. 38.9044 78.12069
Posts: 398
|
yeah, sketches are just that. sketchy. I personally don't think that the two look much the same short of the monster forehead.
the guy in the drawing isn't wearing glasses. is that important? In the states, anyone convicted as a sexual predator has to register every time he moves house. Is it not the same in Canada? Maybe you could check the registry. If he's NOT registered, maybe you should turn him in on those grounds? |
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,388
|
I think you'd make a good Daphne.
Do you have a female friend with glasses, a tall blond guy, a stoner, and a talking dog? If so... I think you guys can figure out the case of the panty pervert. |
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern Italy (No Guidos Here)
Posts: 7,118
|
You did the right thing. That sketch is ridiculous, it could be anybody, but if you knew that your ex was into that stuff, better safe then sorry.
I have to say that if we had to base suspicions on general usual traits, i will jail both Patton oswalt, Zack Galifianakis and myself immediately. Either for terrorism or dangerous pervyness... Plus, if i keep listening to "WTF", and sleeping two minutes per night, i'll turn into the new Tim McVeigh eventually. Last edited by Junkenstein; 09-19-2009 at 09:26 AM. |
| (Offline) |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|