|
|||||||
| Talk Shite General discussion |
| View Poll Results: A jet plane is sitting on a conveyor belt, can it take off? (read post below) | |||
| No - Can't take off |
|
94 | 48.45% |
| Yes - Can take off |
|
100 | 51.55% |
| Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 26
|
If i am not mistaken, this is gonna be a prop plane. The function of the prop is not to generate the airflow over the wings - the function of the prop is to generate forward thrust by pushing the surrounding air backward, so that the wing picks up enough forward speed for the airflow required to take off. Since the prop is pushing against air and not the treadmill, the plane will move forward. The plane should take off.
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Stabbing the haters
Posts: 4,133
|
Quote:
PS, if propeller generates airflow to the wings, then how does a jet engine plane (with the jet in the back) get lift? Imagine a jet plane on this conveyor belt. The jet's in the back, so it has no effect at all on the wings. The jet pushes the plane forward, while the conveyor belt pushes the plane back. The two forces are equal and opposite, so the plane doesn't experience any horizontal motion. I don't see any way for the plane to lift off, and I think the other engines (propeller in the front, or the larger commercial jets with engines on the sides) work the same way. Last edited by DWarrior; 01-28-2008 at 10:35 PM. |
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,424
|
Quote:
|
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,424
|
Good question. As I have pointed out before, the plane, WILL move down the treadmill, but under the thrust created by the jet pushing air molecules (matter) out of the back. This will do 2 tings, 1) also pull air over the air foils of the plane, and 2, Physically move the plane down the treadmill runway. The only difference is in the speed the wheels spin.
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The warm Heaven that is AZ
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
Mythbusters- my 2nd dream job, next to Steve on Blues Clues |
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,424
|
Quote:
|
|
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Stabbing the haters
Posts: 4,133
|
You're right, I completely mis-visualized the setup. I think this explanation makes it clear and is valid:
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/060203.html |
| (Offline) |
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: a small dark room in a basement on an isthmus
Posts: 2,455
|
DoctorRon! Good post. I too am exhausted by dealing with this rumor.
Quote:
Quote:
Thrust means shit. Would a sailboat in the middle of the ocean [with NO wind] move if you mounted a huge fan on the back? It wouldn't, it's thrusting against itself. Just like the jets are thrusting against the conveyer. No Newtonian language. Simple enough for you? |
||
| (Offline) |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|