Latest Episode
Play

Go Back   Keith and The Girl Forums Keith and The Girl Forums Talk Shite

Talk Shite General discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2008, 02:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tech007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 844
Starter dSLR - Nikon or Olympus?

Okay I learned photo stuff on an Olympus OM-10 a zillion years ago. Am very familar with digital tricks and formats. But I've been stuck with a Canon A series forever - time to move up. Resolution isn't as important as low noise. I'll be shooting outdoors, car racing AND dark theatre/concert pix with a long lens.

Want to get a starter dSLR for $500-800 US/Cdn. Will be my first RAW camera.

I know there are some awesome photo pros hanging around here so cough up the info...

My two choices so far -

Nikon D40 -$500 cheap, light, great image quality, speedy operation. good lens selection. cons - 6 meg sensor.

Olympus E410 - $600 - cheap, 2 lens, live preview. 4/3 format. 10Mb sensor. great lens.
cons - short batt life.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 02:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
andsoitgoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,123
Why not continue with Canon and look at the Rebel? GREAT cameras and reasonable pricing.

That's what Newsy was using, and look at the hawtness in his pictures.

you can wait for a sale from Future Shop where they'll throw in some lenses, too - It may be a bit more coinage, but you're going to be using this forever and a day - it's probably worth the extra beans.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 02:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
picard102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,949
Ya, I think everyone with an SLR was using a Canon that weekend.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 02:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Uncast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,229
I'm kind of also in the Canon camp myself however being that you've not listed that among the two, I'd go with a Nikon. Equipment will be more readily available and there's more out there as far as 3rd party lenses (Tamron, Sigma, etc) that works with Nikon instead of those that work with Olympus.
So I think if the only choice is Nikon or Olympus, going Nikon is the easy choice. That being said, if you're used to using Canon, I'd go find a Rebel XTi and start using that. I absolutely love the one I've got and you really can't go wrong with it.

Step away from the dark side. Come back to the light.

Canon Rebel XTi - $500 cheap, light weight, excellent IQ on AF, good control layout, auto sensor cleaning when powering down that I haven't seen in any other dSLR this cheap, user friendly menus, 2.5" LCD screen, 10MP...cons: Well one could say the light weight equals cheap build quality but if you're not going to abuse it, you should be fine. Also there's some limitation that I don't like to see from a dSLR but really the Rebel XTi is next to the low point for Canon dSLRs so if you find that any of these limitations (timer, ISO only goes up to 1600, etc) bug you, then you can always upgrade to the next set of models.
__________________
Latest Episode - 250a: Porn Church
Last Upload of Pics: January 7, 2012


Last edited by Uncast; 04-27-2008 at 02:54 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 02:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Newsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncast View Post
Equipment will be more readily available and there's more out there as far as 3rd party lenses (Tamron, Sigma, etc) that works with Nikon instead of those that work with Olympus.
Not too sure about that. With the D40 and the D40x, you can only use Nikon's DX lenses, PERIOD. It's completely sensor driven, not pin driven like most lenses.

Nikon really messed up when they got rid of the D50 and D70. Those were their best consumer cameras. Now, you can either go for the 40 series, that nikon themselves consider to be a point and shoot with detachable lenses, or you pay almost pay twice the amount, just for the body of the D80.

I don't have any huge qualms with the Olympus serise. One cool thing that is if you buy one of the kits, it comes with a 14-40 lense, which is the widest kit lense I've ever seen. Sure it's not the best glass out there, but that's an awesome range.
__________________
my site
Don't do bad stuff.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Uncast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newsy View Post
Not too sure about that. With the D40 and the D40x, you can only use Nikon's DX lenses, PERIOD. It's completely sensor driven, not pin driven like most lenses.

Nikon really messed up when they got rid of the D50 and D70. Those were their best consumer cameras. Now, you can either go for the 40 series, that nikon themselves consider to be a point and shoot with detachable lenses, or you pay almost pay twice the amount, just for the body of the D80.

I don't have any huge qualms with the Olympus serise. One cool thing that is if you buy one of the kits, it comes with a 14-40 lense, which is the widest kit lense I've ever seen. Sure it's not the best glass out there, but that's an awesome range.
Ahh see it would have helped if I'd have taken the time to look past the brand names and see the models he was looking at. You're right about the lenses in that model. Well, glad I stuck with Canon!

and really? Olympus starts you out with a 14-40? Damn that's nice. 18-55 wasn't terrible by any means but that extra bit could come in handy at times even with the cheap glass.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tech007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 844
Damn you all!

I LOVE my Canon - but their dSLR's are more $$$. Cheapest I can find a xTi 10MB for is $899 with 2 lens. Will hunt around.

Thanks. a LOT. I think...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tech007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 844
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newsy View Post
I don't have any huge qualms with the Olympus serise. One cool thing that is if you buy one of the kits, it comes with a 14-40 lense, which is the widest kit lense I've ever seen. Sure it's not the best glass out there, but that's an awesome range.
I like playing with lens and was attracted to the Olypus 4/3 idea and the selection of lens I'm seeing on-line. The live preview could be handy too. 10MP, 2 lens...$600. not bad.

I'm gonna go test drive an Olympus and a Rebel.

taking two weeks to decide...thanks for the help.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Newsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech007 View Post
Damn you all!

I LOVE my Canon - but their dSLR's are more $$$. Cheapest I can find a xTi 10MB for is $899 with 2 lens. Will hunt around.

Thanks. a LOT. I think...
Heh. I'm loving my XTi, but the only drawback is that, in order to change anything on it, aperture, shutter speed, single vs continuous shot, you have to access the LCD screen



which gets annoying, because I turn the LCD screen off to take pictures, and i have to turn it back on to change settings.

whereas Nikon has stuck with the traditional um.. menu screen

(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 03:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in Diana's kitchen, buried under a mountain of scorn and blue sprinkles.
Posts: 567
just looking at the sensor spec. between the nikon and the oly go with the nikon. the sensor is considerably larger.

but if you want better a blue channel go with the canon.

the xti is still pretty inexpensive with a good all around lens.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16830120070

and another thing to pay attention to is the crop factor. the nikon is a 1.5x and the canon is a 1.6x factor and the oly (with the smaller sensor) is even larger of a crop factor.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Keith and The GirlAd Management plugin by RedTyger