Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
04-27-2008, 02:36 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 844
|
Starter dSLR - Nikon or Olympus?
Okay I learned photo stuff on an Olympus OM-10 a zillion years ago. Am very familar with digital tricks and formats. But I've been stuck with a Canon A series forever - time to move up. Resolution isn't as important as low noise. I'll be shooting outdoors, car racing AND dark theatre/concert pix with a long lens.
Want to get a starter dSLR for $500-800 US/Cdn. Will be my first RAW camera. I know there are some awesome photo pros hanging around here so cough up the info... My two choices so far - Nikon D40 -$500 cheap, light, great image quality, speedy operation. good lens selection. cons - 6 meg sensor. Olympus E410 - $600 - cheap, 2 lens, live preview. 4/3 format. 10Mb sensor. great lens. cons - short batt life. |
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 02:38 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,123
|
Why not continue with Canon and look at the Rebel? GREAT cameras and reasonable pricing.
That's what Newsy was using, and look at the hawtness in his pictures. you can wait for a sale from Future Shop where they'll throw in some lenses, too - It may be a bit more coinage, but you're going to be using this forever and a day - it's probably worth the extra beans. |
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 02:44 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,229
|
I'm kind of also in the Canon camp myself however being that you've not listed that among the two, I'd go with a Nikon. Equipment will be more readily available and there's more out there as far as 3rd party lenses (Tamron, Sigma, etc) that works with Nikon instead of those that work with Olympus.
So I think if the only choice is Nikon or Olympus, going Nikon is the easy choice. That being said, if you're used to using Canon, I'd go find a Rebel XTi and start using that. I absolutely love the one I've got and you really can't go wrong with it. Step away from the dark side. Come back to the light. Canon Rebel XTi - $500 cheap, light weight, excellent IQ on AF, good control layout, auto sensor cleaning when powering down that I haven't seen in any other dSLR this cheap, user friendly menus, 2.5" LCD screen, 10MP...cons: Well one could say the light weight equals cheap build quality but if you're not going to abuse it, you should be fine. Also there's some limitation that I don't like to see from a dSLR but really the Rebel XTi is next to the low point for Canon dSLRs so if you find that any of these limitations (timer, ISO only goes up to 1600, etc) bug you, then you can always upgrade to the next set of models. Last edited by Uncast; 04-27-2008 at 02:54 PM. |
(Offline) |
Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
04-27-2008, 02:57 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 881
|
Quote:
Nikon really messed up when they got rid of the D50 and D70. Those were their best consumer cameras. Now, you can either go for the 40 series, that nikon themselves consider to be a point and shoot with detachable lenses, or you pay almost pay twice the amount, just for the body of the D80. I don't have any huge qualms with the Olympus serise. One cool thing that is if you buy one of the kits, it comes with a 14-40 lense, which is the widest kit lense I've ever seen. Sure it's not the best glass out there, but that's an awesome range. |
|
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 03:02 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
and really? Olympus starts you out with a 14-40? Damn that's nice. 18-55 wasn't terrible by any means but that extra bit could come in handy at times even with the cheap glass. |
|
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 03:11 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 844
|
Quote:
I'm gonna go test drive an Olympus and a Rebel. taking two weeks to decide...thanks for the help. |
|
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 03:16 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 881
|
Quote:
which gets annoying, because I turn the LCD screen off to take pictures, and i have to turn it back on to change settings. whereas Nikon has stuck with the traditional um.. menu screen |
|
(Offline) |
04-27-2008, 03:40 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in Diana's kitchen, buried under a mountain of scorn and blue sprinkles.
Posts: 567
|
just looking at the sensor spec. between the nikon and the oly go with the nikon. the sensor is considerably larger.
but if you want better a blue channel go with the canon. the xti is still pretty inexpensive with a good all around lens. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16830120070 and another thing to pay attention to is the crop factor. the nikon is a 1.5x and the canon is a 1.6x factor and the oly (with the smaller sensor) is even larger of a crop factor. |
(Offline) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|