Quote:
Originally Posted by Gattaca
Thanks for proving my point.
Edit: Also, the fact that you're spending so much time in this thread, writing huge massive replies to absolutely everyone is indicative of quite a few things. I won't start going to ad hominem territory the way you are, but just think about it. Why?
|
And he is the only one? He just said: in a way too diplomatic way, the word "crazy". Ad hominem or not. He isn't the only one doing it. Funny enough he was responding to someone who VERY MUCH was doing that very thing. And funny more, only in response to Pat explaining his point, defending it, then arguing with someone point by point; which is what you do when having a debate.
I want to also point out, how he is acting on the forum is a good contrast how he was on the show. Not majorly, but in what he JUST said that is hardly how he acted on the show. So your point is not backed up actually. However, on what he said about Chemda, I do think hysterical is pushing it. That is hyperbole. Excited and passionate is a better phrasing of Chemda's behavior. But the thing is Keith was too. Chemda was not the only one to debate Pat. I would argue, she was not the only one to be anything. They both were. Chemda was not more "attacking" than Keith was. Because they were ALL in disagreement. Not just Chemda. I'm trying to help here. I want everyone to get along. But one (Pat) can't just say it was ONLY Chemda to get passionate. I hate to say it but that does skew a little bias against The Girl....Which was one of Keith's points about Pat. One I didn't agree with before...
Honestly, the real why isn't WTF Pat. The real why is: Why the fuck is this still being talked about?
EDIT: People disagree. I think everyone has stated why. It's like the Ken Ham and Bill Nye debate. No one will change their mind and no matter how things are explained. It's a waste of time.