1923: The Art of Charm

[PatDixonNYC]

Originally Posted by lattaland

I just wish a genius would molest me.

I'm sure one will…someday.

[Keith]

Originally Posted by PatDixonNYC

Thanks Toni, I can't add anything to that. You nailed it.

The thing is, Toni happens to be absolutely batshit.

[PatDixonNYC]

Originally Posted by Keith

The thing is, Toni happens to be absolutely batshit.

Allegedly.

[Junkenstein]

Pat Dixon is a birlliant man. this is how you DEBATE an issue. I admire and respect him even more now.

[WittyReference]

New Poll:

Did you read every word in this thread and if so did you change your mind from your original opinion?

Answer: less then 1%

[AlexHindley]

I know this is a throwback but your conversation with Pat Dickson has been playing on my mind.
Completely removing the subject matter from the equation Pat displayed a talent for manipulative tactics and arguing. Initially, the back and forth rally between Pat and Chemda was well balanced regardless of who's side you were on, as it went on it was clear Chemda became more passionate and seemed frustrated with Pat's solid defense of a convicted child rapist. As soon as shit hit the fan, when Pat finally pushed you two to a point where you would snap under the layers of deliberate poking, he backed off in a condescending and coy bullshit attempt to make you seem further from fact and closer to blind anger. His tactics were manipulative and immature and it seems he needs to take his head out of his ass and take the reactions he probed like the professional he claims to be. I'm 17 and I use the same tactics all the time when i get my parents riled up in an argument and it unsettles me to think a heavily listened to news podcast and someone who acts as if he argues professionally, has the same mental approach to conflict as a 17 year old.

Chemda, admittdly you got angry and towards the end seemed to attack Pat with evidence and articles but why the fuck not. You were having a serious conversation with someone who was deliberately a childish headfuck. You were passionate and vocal and in no way were you a "bitch" as some people have emailed you, however after a while you became frustratingly infuriated because you were indeed arguing with a sly fuckhead but you did seem to verbally attack him towards the end. Justified.

Superfuck Pat.

Kieth, peace and love peace and love don't hurt me.
Yes I posted this in another thread. but the real question is did he do it

[AlexHindley]

Yes.
Yes he did.

[Enunciated Piffle]

I feel sorry for Shenanigans.

The latest episode of NYC Crime Report 'Drugged Oatmeal' was hilarious.

Maybe Pat can come back onto KATG and discuss things more to their liking. You know, like how there is no God, human rights, and how awful Russia is.

I'd like to see KATG return to happier times. A time where Pat Dixon was a KATG guest favorite. There was no talk of Woody Allen. The only thing uttered were little white lies from hipsters trying to play it off like they'd actually seen his films. Yes. Happier times. More American times really.

KATG. A return to normalcy. Hell, I can almost smell it on my jizz rag and see it in live chat now...

[PatDixonNYC]

Originally Posted by WittyReference

New Poll:

Did you read every word in this thread and if so did you change your mind from your original opinion?

Answer: less then 1%

I doubt anyone read every word I wrote, because most of these people have obviously read nothing about the case besides Dylan's letter. You can tell by their comments.

But the information is there for anyone who would like to know facts about this subject and make up their own mind rather than just repeat the lies that someone else says.

[PatDixonNYC]

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

I know this is a throwback but your conversation with Pat Dickson has been playing on my mind.
Completely removing the subject matter from the equation Pat displayed a talent for manipulative tactics and arguing.

Everything I said was factual, there was no need to manipulate anything.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

Initially, the back and forth rally between Pat and Chemda was well balanced regardless of who's side you were on, as it went on it was clear Chemda became more passionate and seemed frustrated with Pat's solid defense of a convicted child rapist.

Woody Allen isn't a convicted child rapist, he was never even charged with a crime.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

As soon as shit hit the fan, when Pat finally pushed you two to a point where you would snap under the layers of deliberate poking, he backed off in a condescending and coy bullshit attempt to make you seem further from fact and closer to blind anger.

Keith and Chemda made themselves seem "further from fact and closer to blind anger" by saying inaccurate things and getting angry. You can't blame me for the behavior of the hosts or how you perceive them.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

His tactics were manipulative and immature and it seems he needs to take his head out of his ass and take the reactions he probed like the professional he claims to be. I'm 17 and I use the same tactics all the time when i get my parents riled up in an argument and it unsettles me to think a heavily listened to news podcast and someone who acts as if he argues professionally, has the same mental approach to conflict as a 17 year old.

Keep your family issues out of this, junior.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

Chemda, admittdly you got angry and towards the end seemed to attack Pat with evidence and articles but why the fuck not.

Chemda presented no articles, and no credible evidence. What show were you listening to? In fact, when I asked for documentation of their claim that Soon-Yi was 15 when the polaroids were taken, they refused to even look. It's not true, she was in her 20's.

Is it possible you have a learning disability, because there's no shame in that, son.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

You were having a serious conversation with someone who was deliberately a childish headfuck.

No, that's what she does every OTHER day, when I'm not there.

Originally Posted by AlexHindley

You were passionate and vocal and in no way were you a "bitch" as some people have emailed you, however after a while you became frustratingly infuriated because you were indeed arguing with a sly fuckhead but you did seem to verbally attack him towards the end. Justified.

Superfuck Pat.

Kieth, peace and love peace and love don't hurt me.
Yes I posted this in another thread. but the real question is did he do it

If he's a convicted child rapist, as you claim, then obviously he did it. But he's not, he wasn't even charged. So tell me this: What have you actually read about this case?

But you're right, the fact that I knew more about the subject did annoy them.