1129: Cerebral

[Junkenstein]

Maybe i'm missing something Yoav but this guy is a dangerous person because he's going to mass? Or because he (or she) said that whatever people say, he will have something that people cannot take away?

If your issue is with the latter statement, let me do a rephrasing:

"On the 15th of april, me and 500 other people will attend a KATG meeting. We will have something that outsiders dont understand. Right or wrong. We will have it. No one can take that away. It is a real source of strength for us"

What a nut, right? But believe me that sentence will go through the head of a lot of people here.

A lot of angry atheists that havent learned enough of the marvel that cold emotionless reason can give, act as their stance against religion is a battle postion and religious people are the enemy. Problem is, a guy who thinks that he will have a community feeling by going to church doesnt do any real harm.

Now if said guy said that he is going to attend a 500 people gathering of the church of the burning nigger, now that would be desputable. But still harmless, as long as it is a gathering (let them gather, who gives a shit)

But if said guy posted, i will meet with other people and we will bash the brains out of all non-believers, he would be dangerous. Hell he would be dangerous even if he was beating up non believers on his own. And he will be at least reprobable if he was pointing his finger and inuslting non believers.

But, see, my idea of atheism is believing in reason and logic and in the absence of absolute truths. So, taking away religion from the equation, you're the one that's attacking him because of his beliefs. You're pointing the finger and accusing. You're labeling him. You're segregatingn him.

You're the one whoi's acting dangerous. So be the atheist person and take the high road and answer like a true atheist:

"I'm going to a gathering of 500 people and we will blablabla"
"Whatever"