Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
10-26-2010, 01:03 AM | #11 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
Look I'm not saying girls in this contest are doing that, only that I applaud Viola's point of view
__________________
My Home on the Web Last edited by Kupotek; 10-26-2010 at 09:44 AM. |
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 02:15 AM | #12 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
|
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 02:42 AM | #13 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern Italy (No Guidos Here)
Posts: 6,784
|
Quote:
Any girl showed what they felt comfortable with showing and they were all beautiful and a blessing from something higher. Let's leave the objectification mumbo jumbo elsewhere. |
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 06:24 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Not one of the girls who "showed tit for a vote" did so under any form of coercion. They were having a spot of sexy fun with their friends, entirely of their own volition. It's a beautiful thing, I'm baffled as to why you'd want to shit on that. Your opinions on modesty are completely fucking irrelevant and, quite frankly, severely chauvinistic. |
|
(Offline) |
Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
10-26-2010, 06:34 AM | #15 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 124
|
This is how you know the dumbing down of America is complete. I can applaud a girl for not exploiting herself and be called a chauvinist... amazing..
I wasn't stirring up shit about the contest, just encouraging the girl, as what i saw as a valid act or decision... nothing political. How applauding one girl's decision can lead to me wanting girls in burqas is an absurdity so profound as to be ludicrous. Last edited by Kupotek; 10-26-2010 at 06:39 AM. |
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 06:54 AM | #16 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 409
|
Nettipoo got the tattoo!? I drew it for her in response to her thread on the forums and I didn't even know that she had gotten it. I just figured nothing ever came of it.
And it looks great! Glad you liked the design Netti :-) hooray! I'm happy to try to come up with other designs if people have requests, but I'm not a pro like Latta, so they won't all be gems and I won't be offended if what I come up with isn't your thing. Unless you're Elvis Rico and put me through 5 or 6 different designs and then don't get any of them. (just kidding elvis ) |
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 06:55 AM | #17 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Detroitish
Posts: 1,025
|
Quote:
The fact that you don't get why what you did was wrong and how it was a backhanded compliment at the expense of the other women, who were generous and wonderful enough to play a part in this event, shows how incredibly small minded and ignorant you are. Vi is one of my good friends and she knows we all support whatever decisions she makes, but I can tell her I love what she did without debasing others. Fuck you, you are scum. |
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 07:17 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
|
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 08:17 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Yay, you own a thesaurus. Good for you. I'm disappointed but not surprised by your blindness to your chauvinism here. It is precisely your objection to women "exploiting themselves" and your assertion that you get to define what that means for all women that makes you a chauvinist. Controlling attitudes towards women are almost always founded upon what the controller determines to be in the best interest of women - it's the notion that women should not freely express their sexualities or exploit their own bodies however they see fit because modesty is "for their own good" and, more pernicious yet, for society's own good. Most chauvinists consider themselves a friend to women. A big strong friend that'll protect them from the big bad world and, if necessary, a woman's own agency and judgment if her decisions threaten the chauvinist's definition of modesty or if she would like to interact with the big bad world in a manner that the chauvinist disapproves of. Let's return to your prior post, your statement that women who showed an amount of skin going over some arbitrary limit that you yourself imposed somehow denigrates their "integrity and honor." Vi chose to keep her nipples concealed, a number of other women did not. I fail to see how these decisions track at all with the honor and integrity of any of the women involved. Shall we assume that, because Vi was slightly more demur, she can also be expected to keep her word more reliably, to never default on debts, to speak truthfully at all times, to behave in an generally honorable manner at all levels of her life, simply because she kept her shirt buttoned? Do you see how your statement is an underhanded attack on the characters of every other girl in that contest? You "applaud her decision" to the detriment of all other decisions made in that amazing thread. Vi's relative modesty elevates her, in your view, as the most "honorable" of the bunch - therefore, the women who went topless must be less honorable. There's no logic to this position. I wonder where the cutoff point is between honorable and dishonorable nudity? You don't seem to object to a girl showing her stomach. An exposed stomach is honorable, exposed nipples are not. Where's the midpoint? Is a handbra permissible? How about underboob? Sideboob? You don't seem to object to cleavage. Would the use of pasties have preserved the honor of the other contestants? With or without tassles? Are bikini briefs honorable but g-strings not? At what percentage of exposed skin does a woman go from expressing herself to "exploiting" herself, if in all cases the photographs are taken as a function of that woman's own agency? Furthermore, how can it be exploitation if the choice to pose for such pictures is a decision 100% in the hands of the woman in question? Was that too long to read? You've demonstrated some difficulty with reading comprehension already. In sum: Your post was bad and you should feel bad. |
|
(Offline) |
10-26-2010, 08:21 AM | #20 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
In the hottest guy contest, Medium Brumski is showing off his arms for votes. Is that exploitation? Jukenstein showed his ass. TwoHumps has a nice stomach, which is going in the jerk bank. And is definitely the reason I voted for him. Does it matter because they're men? Who gets to draw the line? If you're curious, I'm not being a dick. I really want to know. |
|
(Offline) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|