2356: High Steaks

Sparrow · 04-01-2016, 11:07 AM

the division of that moose is not in proportion to the the difference between the delegate counts. it looks as though Bernie has a /significant/ overage to Obama and that doesn't feel like the case here.

i'm saying this graph is bullshit.

Eric M · 04-01-2016, 11:20 AM

The division of the colors of the moose aren't to show percentage. That's just the democratic party symbol. The numbers are real. Go look them up. Were you paying attention in 2008? Because Obama was considered as unlikely as they are trying to paint Sanders now.

Sparrow · 04-01-2016, 11:27 AM

i didn't say the numbers weren't real, i'm saying they were shittily presented and DO make Bernie seem way more ahead than Obama was. the infographic was poorly designed.

Sparrow · 04-01-2016, 11:28 AM

Bernie's great, but let's not deify him or inflate him. it makes you all look like weirdo zealots.

Lanfear · 04-01-2016, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric M

The division of the colors of the moose aren't to show percentage. That's just the democratic party symbol. The numbers are real. Go look them up. Were you paying attention in 2008? Because Obama was considered as unlikely as they are trying to paint Sanders now.

Come on you know that the colour division is mean to imply % share

I work in market research, this is typical shady Fox News level misleading graphs 101

Eric M · 04-01-2016, 11:39 AM

yea im sure whoever created the image was totally banking on people not reading it at all and only looking at the allocation of color representation on the donkey. Give me a fuckin break weirdos.

Sparrow · 04-01-2016, 11:44 AM

you don't know how graphs work. ok. now i know from where we are starting with you.

LostAgain · 04-01-2016, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Girl

He was targeting Utah which is a very conservative state with lots of Mormons.
The picture was put out around the time they voted.

Well Trump should have just responded with one with Ivana, Marla, and Melania. It might have confused some FLDS into thinking he supported polygamy

Lanfear · 04-01-2016, 11:46 AM

They picked a visualization that makes their point look good and you picked this one vs a boring bar graph that would show a realistic difference.

Not that you can't make bar graphs fucked up

Eric M · 04-01-2016, 11:46 AM

Its not a graph. It's an image. With numbers on it. So you can't read numbers. Now I know where I'm starting with you.

View Poll Results: Filet mignon
Yummy	40	88.89%
Vomitous	5	11.11%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

04-01-2016, 11:07 AM	#11 (permalink)
Sparrow Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,395	the division of that moose is not in proportion to the the difference between the delegate counts. it looks as though Bernie has a /significant/ overage to Obama and that doesn't feel like the case here. i'm saying this graph is bullshit. Lanfear likes this.
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:20 AM	#12 (permalink)
Eric M Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Posts: 448	The division of the colors of the moose aren't to show percentage. That's just the democratic party symbol. The numbers are real. Go look them up. Were you paying attention in 2008? Because Obama was considered as unlikely as they are trying to paint Sanders now.
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:27 AM	#13 (permalink)
Sparrow Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,395	i didn't say the numbers weren't real, i'm saying they were shittily presented and DO make Bernie seem way more ahead than Obama was. the infographic was poorly designed.
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:28 AM	#14 (permalink)
Sparrow Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,395	Bernie's great, but let's not deify him or inflate him. it makes you all look like weirdo zealots.
(Offline)


Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast Check out the recent shows Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes. Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel.

04-01-2016, 11:39 AM	#16 (permalink)
Eric M Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Posts: 448	yea im sure whoever created the image was totally banking on people not reading it at all and only looking at the allocation of color representation on the donkey. Give me a fuckin break weirdos.
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:44 AM	#17 (permalink)
Sparrow Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgia Posts: 5,395	you don't know how graphs work. ok. now i know from where we are starting with you.
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:46 AM	#19 (permalink)
Lanfear Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Frankfurt am Main, Germany Posts: 2,577	They picked a visualization that makes their point look good and you picked this one vs a boring bar graph that would show a realistic difference. Not that you can't make bar graphs fucked up
(Offline)

04-01-2016, 11:46 AM	#20 (permalink)
Eric M Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL Posts: 448	Its not a graph. It's an image. With numbers on it. So you can't read numbers. Now I know where I'm starting with you.
(Offline)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Join the Show