Latest Episode
Play

Go Back   Keith and The Girl Forums Keith and The Girl Forums Show Talk

Show Talk Talk about the show

View Poll Results: Who of the following have been the most oppressed?
Jews 77 32.22%
Blacks 88 36.82%
Gays 74 30.96%
Voters: 239. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2009, 04:56 PM   #61 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 10
Lauren rocks

Have her on again! Nuff of this cameo shit!
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 10:05 PM   #62 (permalink)
Senior Member
2023 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2022 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2021 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2020 Marathon Kickstarter Backer2019 Marathon Kickstarter Backer24-hour Marathon 2017 Fundraiser Backer57-hour Marathon 2015 Kickstarter Backer38-hour Marathon 2014 Kickstarter Backer54-hour Marathon 2013 Kickstarter Backer
 
Bucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aotearoa
Posts: 3,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cretaceous Bob View Post
You're forgetting that we're weighing the suffering of specific peoples here, not determining which criminal was the worst. I am comparing the genocide with that in mind. I do think that the enslavement of African peoples is on par with all of Hitler's genocide, though, and I have given my reasons for thinking so already.

Then I would point out that, if we are accounting for trends, slavery tends to be on a larger scale than genocide.
No, I'm not forgetting anything, just digressing to illustrate points.

To oppress is to prevent cruelly, and I contend that what is prevented by wiping a race of people from existence is a magnitude more than what is prevented by enslaving them. You might weigh the greater numbers enslaved in the Americas (14 million) against the smaller numbers of Jews affected by the Third Reich (9.5 million living in Europe in 1939), and like I said, you have something of an argument there because of those factors, the greater number affected and the length of the endurance of the oppression.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cretaceous Bob View Post
As I said, that it a crime, but it cannot compare to the suffering of very real people.
I get why you put it this way, but you've missed the point. Being faced with genocide happens to very real people. The suffering of those very real people is based in the fact that they are not just either hunted or interned in horrific conditions, but that their oppressors not only have no intention of letting them live, they have no intention of letting their entire people live.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cretaceous Bob View Post
Our instinct also drives us to secure comfort and security for those related to us, and I would say depriving us of the ability to do that is also denying the reason for our existence. Every single piece of our instinct dictates the avoidance of suffering, and so it is contradicted by the infliction of suffering.
Yes, but that drive to secure comfort and security is driven by the survival instinct. The survival instinct is the base, is the reason for our existence. The desire for comfort and security is born from that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cretaceous Bob View Post
... requiring a choice between one or the other does not indicate a lack of a marginal difference; it only shows that a detectable difference exists, and does not indicate the size of that difference.
You're right, the question should be to give an indication of the difference, not just a simple yes or no.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cretaceous Bob View Post
I would also ask you: would you rather live your life as you have and as you will, except sterile for its entirety, or endure a lifetime of suffering, and raise a child that you cannot educate, you cannot provide for, and cannot protect from horrendous abuse, nor save it from repeating your own horrible lifetime of inflicted cruelties?

If you choose the latter, you prove that aversion to suffering is a greater drive than the need to reproduce. That is the choice I would make.
No, this is just as sloppy as the question I put. For the sake of answering whether survival instinct is a greater driver than the desire for a comfortable life you're asking someone to choose between slavery and sterility? The scale is as wildly skewed as if I asked you to choose between being subjected to genocide vs being subjected to lifelong detention. A more solid comparison would be comfortable sterility with some form of detention that allowed breeding.

But whatever theoretical scenarios we might invent the fact remains that all species continue to reproduce despite the fact that having children more often than not leads to more inconvenience and discomfort than when the animal was without young. Rearing offspring in itself brings greater danger and more potential for discomfort and suffering but the rewards outbalance that aversion to a massive extent, and that in itself is the proof that as a rule (and even though we can easily find some exceptions to this rule, Chemda being a perfect example) survival instinct far, far outweighs desire for comfort.

Last edited by Bucho; 06-27-2009 at 10:11 PM.
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 12:53 AM   #63 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
propertyofbrolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 0
favorite show of the moment went and get all of ben's stock of songs afterwards.
i'd really like the clip of ben singing "my name is ben lerman", but i don't know how to cut it out. if anyone could do that i'd love you forever...
(Offline)   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
Keith and The GirlAd Management plugin by RedTyger