Keetpolitik

[big bad bold]

I like the way Keith's politics defy simple explanation. He voted for Obama and thinks Palin is tarded, but he supports capital punishment for littering.

[Keith]

I like how you didn't explain why this is a paradox.

[big bad bold]

I hold Keith's paradoxical truths to be self evident.

[Keith]

I like how you got me excited to see your response and you said nothing.

[CuriousKlepto]

Originally Posted by big bad bold

I like the way Keith's politics defy simple explanation. He voted for Obama and thinks Palin is tarded, but he supports capital punishment for littering.

Don't you listen to the show, he's explained his points quite clearly, I may not agree with Keith's Justice but he has explained why he feels that way. Make a real arguement if you're gonna even bother to post anything. Show your work don't just make broad statements, finish a thought, show some follow thruogh.

And for the record Palin is a bit touched, there's not really a way to argue otherwise.

[The F-ing Man]

The problem is that keith is too logical to commit to either side of the bipartisan political system. I'd tag him as more of a liberitarian. More willing to look at what makes sense at the time, versus those who decide based on a few key factors set by religion or what have you. Plus, Keet just plain makes fuckin sense.

[golgi body]

Originally Posted by The F-ing Man

I'd tag him as more of a libertarian.

I don't think so.

[big bad bold]

Originally Posted by CuriousKlepto

Don't you listen to the show, he's explained his points quite clearly, I may not agree with Keith's Justice but he has explained why he feels that way. Make a real arguement if you're gonna even bother to post anything. Show your work don't just make broad statements, finish a thought, show some follow thruogh.

And for the record Palin is a bit touched, there's not really a way to argue otherwise.

WHOA simmer down now! I wasn't attacking Keith. I was saying that I think it is interesting that Liberals cannot claim Keith even though he voted for "O". Proof he is not a liberal would be his rejection of egalitarianism and his support for the death penalty. Conservatives cannot claim him either because he rejects homophobia and the anti-intellectualism of Palin.

I don't necessarily agree or disagree with you Keith. I can disagree with you if you like, if that would make for a more interesting time here on the forums.

[Grapist]

Originally Posted by big bad bold

WHOA simmer down now! I wasn't attacking Keith. I was saying that I think it is interesting that Liberals cannot claim Keith even though he voted for "O". Proof he is not a liberal would be his rejection of egalitarianism and his support for the death penalty. Conservatives cannot claim him either because he rejects homophobia and the anti-intellectualism of Palin.

I don't necessarily agree or disagree with you Keith. I can disagree with you if you like, if that would make for a more interesting time here on the forums.

Wow, you mean things aren't black and white? You mean everything isn't objective? People can have beliefs and conventions that do not fit into the predefined politcal categories??

ZOMG!!! EVERYBODY PANIC!!!

[big bad bold]

Originally Posted by Grapist

Wow, you mean things aren't black and white? You mean everything isn't objective? People can have beliefs and conventions that do not fit into the predefined politcal categories??

ZOMG!!! EVERYBODY PANIC!!!

Yes!!

In my case I am a liberal, but I support capital punishment for forum shit talkers.