|
Show Talk Talk about the show |
View Poll Results: Sexual preferences aside, would you date Richie Tolway? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 67.57% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 32.43% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
PARTY! SUPER PARTY!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, baby!
Posts: 11,766
|
2876: Eat, Cry, Love w/ Richie Tolway
Fixing furniture and breaking relationships; therapy, medication, and world traveling; homophobic baker's win with the Supreme Court; Bill Clinton's new book, his non-apology to Monica Lewinsky, his sexual assault allegations, and Hillary's support
Guest: Richie Tolway ![]() Share this episode: Twitter, Facebook & email Get the show: on iTunes, on Stitcher and RSS feed |
(Offline) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 874
|
Nooooooo, not Myka and Richie :'-(
(spoiler alert) Edit: Richie sounds like a sweet guy who knows what he wants. Hope things turn around for him. Last edited by thirteen; 06-06-2018 at 12:48 AM. |
(Offline) |
![]() |
Keith and The Girl is a free comedy talk show and podcast
Check out the recent shows
Click here to get Keith and The Girl free on iTunes.
Click here to get the podcast RSS feed. Click here to watch all the videos on our YouTube channel. |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fitzwalkerstan
Posts: 3,517
|
There's a lot of misunderstanding about what the Supreme Court ruling on this Colorado cake case really means. It's not a crushing blow for same sex couples or an endorsement of religious bigotry as it's being portrayed. It's totally understandable why there is confusion because the press reports of it don't really clarify what the ruling MEANS.
The SC made a very specific ruling about the procedure used by the civil rights council (or whatever) in Colorado. SCOTUS did NOT strike down the law that was used to punish the baker. Basically they said that the council didn't follow the law as it was written and that the case against the baker has to be reheard. They just kicked the issue back down a step. It's all pretty technical legal shit which is why regular people (and reporters without any legal training) don't really understand the meat of the issue. Quote:
__________________
"A quarter of you are doing coke... Somebody got a dick attached"--Keet #1287 "The Adam's apple is like the balls of the throat" --Keet #904 "I understand I'm punchin a guy in his sleep, but that's when I have to punch him" -- Keet #839 "I'll Judge you all day. It's why I woke up"--Patrice #796 "Tell me there's peppers and I'll gut myself like a Japanese"--Keet #671 "I yell, I make kids cry. I get into it" --Keet #590 |
|
(Offline) |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|